Rover 75 1999 vs Rover 75 2004

 
Rover 75
1999 - 2004
Rover 75
2004 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.8 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 150 HP120 HP
Torque: 185 NM160 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.2 seconds11.6 seconds
Rover 75 1999 is more dynamic to drive.
Rover 75 1999 engine produces 30 HP more power than Rover 75 2004, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Rover 75 2004. Thanks to more power Rover 75 1999 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.47.8
The Rover 75 2004 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Rover 75 1999 consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 75 2004, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 75 1999 could require 240 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 65 litres65 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 690 km in combined cycle830 km in combined cycle
920 km on highway1060 km on highway
Rover 75 2004 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 330'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Rover 75 2004 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 6 years11 years
Engine spread: Used also on Rover 45Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Rover 25, Rover 45
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Rover 75 2004 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.75 m4.75 m
Width: 1.78 m1.78 m
Height: 1.43 m1.39 m
Rover 75 1999 and Rover 75 2004 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 432 litres432 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
432 litres432 litres
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters11.4 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`0002`000
Safety: no data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 18001400
Pros and Cons: Rover 75 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Rover 75 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv