Rover 75 2003 vs Rover 75 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 131 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Rover 75 2003 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 75 2003 engine produces 15 HP more power than Rover 75 2004, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Rover 75 2004. Thanks to more power Rover 75 2003 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.8 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| 1470 km on highway | 1380 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.39 m | |
| Rover 75 2003 and Rover 75 2004 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | 432 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
432 litres | 432 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`030 | 2`030 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 75 has
|
Rover 75 has
| |