Rover 75 2003 vs Audi A6 2001

 
Rover 75
2003 - 2004
Audi A6
2001 - 2004
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 131 HP130 HP
Torque: 300 NM285 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.8 seconds10.5 seconds
Rover 75 engine produces 1 HP more power than Audi A6, whereas torque is 15 NM more than Audi A6. Despite the higher power, Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.95.7
Real fuel consumption: 7.3 l/100km6.5 l/100km
The Audi A6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Rover 75 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 75 could require 180 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Rover 75 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6.
Fuel tank capacity: 65 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 940 km in combined cycle1220 km in combined cycle
1250 km on highway1520 km on highway
890 km with real consumption1070 km with real consumption
Audi A6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.75 m4.80 m
Width: 1.78 m1.81 m
Height: 1.43 m1.45 m
Both cars are similar in size. Rover 75 is 5 cm shorter than the Audi A6, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 75 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 432 litres551 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
432 litresno data
Audi A6 has more luggage space.
Rover 75 has 119 litres less trunk space than the Audi A6.
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters11.7 meters
The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Audi A6.
Gross weight (kg): no data2`030
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 18001600
Pros and Cons:
    Audi A6 has
    • more dynamic
    • lower fuel consumption
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • roomier boot
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv