Rover 75 1999 vs SAAB 9-5 1997

 
Rover 75
1999 - 2004
SAAB 9-5
1997 - 2001
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 116 HP150 HP
Torque: 260 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.7 seconds9.8 seconds
SAAB 9-5 is a more dynamic driving.
Rover 75 engine produces 34 HP less power than SAAB 9-5, but torque is 20 NM more than SAAB 9-5. Due to the lower power, Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.89.2
Real fuel consumption: 6.3 l/100km9.2 l/100km
The Rover 75 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Rover 75 consumes 3.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-5, which means that by driving the Rover 75 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 510 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Rover 75 consumes 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-5.
Fuel tank capacity: 65 litres75 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1120 km in combined cycle810 km in combined cycle
1380 km on highway1100 km on highway
1030 km with real consumption810 km with real consumption
Rover 75 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.75 m4.80 m
Width: 1.78 m1.79 m
Height: 1.43 m1.45 m
Both cars are similar in size. Rover 75 is 5 cm shorter than the SAAB 9-5, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 75 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 432 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
432 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 0.6 metres more than that of the SAAB 9-5, which means Rover 75 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0301`800
Safety:
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 18001000
Pros and Cons: Rover 75 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
SAAB 9-5 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv