Rover 75 1999 vs Volvo S70 1997

 
Rover 75
1999 - 2004
Volvo S70
1997 - 1999
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.5 Diesel

Performance

Power: 116 HP140 HP
Torque: 260 NM290 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.7 seconds9.9 seconds
Volvo S70 is a more dynamic driving.
Rover 75 engine produces 24 HP less power than Volvo S70, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Volvo S70. Due to the lower power, Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.86.6
Real fuel consumption: 6.3 l/100km6.9 l/100km
The Rover 75 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Rover 75 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S70, which means that by driving the Rover 75 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Rover 75 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S70.
Fuel tank capacity: 65 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1120 km in combined cycle1060 km in combined cycle
1380 km on highway1340 km on highway
1030 km with real consumption1010 km with real consumption
Rover 75 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.75 m4.72 m
Width: 1.78 m1.76 m
Height: 1.43 m1.39 m
Rover 75 is larger.
Rover 75 is 3 cm longer than the Volvo S70, 2 cm wider, while the height of Rover 75 is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 432 litres470 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
432 litresno data
Volvo S70 has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Rover 75 has 38 litres less trunk space than the Volvo S70. This could mean that the Rover 75 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters10.2 meters
The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 1.2 metres more than that of the Volvo S70, which means Rover 75 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0301`600
Safety:
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): 18001200
Pros and Cons: Rover 75 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Volvo S70 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv