Rover 75 1999 vs Skoda Superb 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 101 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
|
Rover 75 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 75 engine produces 15 HP more power than Skoda Superb, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Skoda Superb. Thanks to more power Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Superb is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Rover 75 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 75 could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Rover 75 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| 1030 km with real consumption | 1140 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.47 m | |
| Rover 75 is 5 cm shorter than the Skoda Superb, 2 cm wider, while the height of Rover 75 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
432 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Skoda Superb, which means Rover 75 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`030 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 75 has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |