Rover 75 1999 vs Chrysler Stratus 1995

 
Rover 75
1999 - 2004
Chrysler Stratus
1995 - 2001
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 116 HP161 HP
Torque: 260 NM218 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.7 seconds10.5 seconds
Chrysler Stratus is a more dynamic driving.
Rover 75 engine produces 45 HP less power than Chrysler Stratus, but torque is 42 NM more than Chrysler Stratus. Due to the lower power, Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.810.7
Real fuel consumption: 6.3 l/100km10.8 l/100km
The Rover 75 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Rover 75 consumes 4.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Stratus, which means that by driving the Rover 75 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 735 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Rover 75 consumes 4.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Stratus.
Fuel tank capacity: 65 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1120 km in combined cycle560 km in combined cycle
1380 km on highway740 km on highway
1030 km with real consumption550 km with real consumption
Rover 75 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.75 m4.75 m
Width: 1.78 m1.82 m
Height: 1.43 m1.37 m
Rover 75 and Chrysler Stratus are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 432 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
432 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Chrysler Stratus, which means Rover 75 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0301`200
Safety: no data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 1800600
Pros and Cons: Rover 75 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Chrysler Stratus has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv