Rover 75 1999 vs Chrysler Stratus 1995
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 116 HP | 161 HP | |
Torque: | 260 NM | 218 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
Chrysler Stratus is a more dynamic driving. Rover 75 engine produces 45 HP less power than Chrysler Stratus, but torque is 42 NM more than Chrysler Stratus. Due to the lower power, Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 10.7 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 10.8 l/100km | |
The Rover 75 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Rover 75 consumes 4.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Stratus, which means that by driving the Rover 75 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 735 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Rover 75 consumes 4.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Stratus. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
1380 km on highway | 740 km on highway | ||
1030 km with real consumption | 550 km with real consumption | ||
Rover 75 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.75 m | 4.75 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.37 m | |
Rover 75 and Chrysler Stratus are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
432 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Chrysler Stratus, which means Rover 75 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`030 | 1`200 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1800 | 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Rover 75 has
|
Chrysler Stratus has
| |