Rover 75 2002 vs SAAB 9-3 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 167 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Rover 75 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 75 engine produces 28 HP more power than SAAB 9-3, whereas torque is 48 NM more than SAAB 9-3. Thanks to more power Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 7.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.4 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
The SAAB 9-3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Rover 75 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 75 could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Rover 75 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Rover 75 is larger, but slightly lower. Rover 75 is 11 cm longer than the SAAB 9-3, 2 cm wider, while the height of Rover 75 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
432 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 0.6 metres more than that of the SAAB 9-3, which means Rover 75 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`960 | 1`400 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 75 has
|
SAAB 9-3 has
| |