Rover 75 1999 vs SAAB 9-3 2003

 
Rover 75
1999 - 2004
SAAB 9-3
2003 - 2007
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol1.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 120 HP122 HP
Torque: 160 NM167 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.6 seconds11.5 seconds
Rover 75 engine produces 2 HP less power than SAAB 9-3, whereas torque is 7 NM less than SAAB 9-3. Due to the lower power, Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.87.9
Real fuel consumption: 9.1 l/100km8.2 l/100km
The SAAB 9-3 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise.
By specification Rover 75 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3, which means that by driving the Rover 75 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Rover 75 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3.
Fuel tank capacity: 65 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 830 km in combined cycle780 km in combined cycle
1060 km on highway1000 km on highway
710 km with real consumption750 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.75 m4.64 m
Width: 1.78 m1.76 m
Height: 1.43 m1.47 m
Rover 75 is larger, but slightly lower.
Rover 75 is 11 cm longer than the SAAB 9-3, 2 cm wider, while the height of Rover 75 is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 432 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
432 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 0.6 metres more than that of the SAAB 9-3, which means Rover 75 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0001`400
Safety:
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 18001600
Pros and Cons: Rover 75 has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
SAAB 9-3 has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • higher safety
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv