Rover 75 1999 vs Audi A6 2001

 
Rover 75
1999 - 2004
Audi A6
2001 - 2004
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol1.8 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain and belt

Performance

Power: 120 HP150 HP
Torque: 160 NM210 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.6 seconds9.7 seconds
Audi A6 is a more dynamic driving.
Rover 75 engine produces 30 HP less power than Audi A6, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Audi A6. Due to the lower power, Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.88.4
Real fuel consumption: 9.1 l/100km9.5 l/100km
The Rover 75 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Rover 75 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6, which means that by driving the Rover 75 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Rover 75 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6.
Fuel tank capacity: 65 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 830 km in combined cycle830 km in combined cycle
1060 km on highway1060 km on highway
710 km with real consumption730 km with real consumption

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 11 years8 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Rover 25, Rover 45Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Skoda Octavia, Skoda Superb
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: 4.75 m4.80 m
Width: 1.78 m1.81 m
Height: 1.43 m1.45 m
Both cars are similar in size. Rover 75 is 5 cm shorter than the Audi A6, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 75 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 432 litres551 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
432 litresno data
Audi A6 has more luggage space.
Rover 75 has 119 litres less trunk space than the Audi A6.
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters11.7 meters
The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Audi A6.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0001`980
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 18001600
Pros and Cons: Rover 75 has
  • lower fuel consumption
Audi A6 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv