Rover 75 2004 vs Subaru Outback 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 223 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
| Rover 75 engine produces 21 HP more power than Subaru Outback, whereas torque is 17 NM more than Subaru Outback. Despite the higher power, Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 9.5 | |
|
The Subaru Outback is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 75 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 75 could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.58 m | |
|
Rover 75 is larger, but lower. Rover 75 is 7 cm longer than the Subaru Outback, 4 cm wider, while the height of Rover 75 is 19 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 464 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1222 litres | no data | |
|
Subaru Outback has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Rover 75 has 64 litres less trunk space than the Subaru Outback. This could mean that the Rover 75 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 1`980 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 75 has
|
Subaru Outback has
| |