Rover 75 2004 vs Ford Mondeo 2003

 
Rover 75
2004 - 2005
Ford Mondeo
2003 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 131 HP115 HP
Torque: 300 NM280 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.3 seconds11.2 seconds
Rover 75 engine produces 16 HP more power than Ford Mondeo, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Ford Mondeo. Despite the higher power, Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.86.0
Real fuel consumption: 6.3 l/100km6.5 l/100km
By specification Rover 75 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that by driving the Rover 75 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Rover 75 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo.
Fuel tank capacity: 65 litres56 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1120 km in combined cycle930 km in combined cycle
1470 km on highway1160 km on highway
1030 km with real consumption860 km with real consumption
Rover 75 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.79 m4.80 m
Width: 1.78 m1.81 m
Height: 1.39 m1.44 m
Rover 75 is smaller.
Rover 75 is 1 cm shorter than the Ford Mondeo, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 75 is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 400 litres540 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1222 litres1700 litres
Ford Mondeo has more luggage space.
Rover 75 has 140 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mondeo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Mondeo (by 478 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Ford Mondeo.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0902`140
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 18001000
Pros and Cons: Rover 75 has
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Ford Mondeo has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv