Rover 75 2004 vs Toyota Avensis 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 131 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
| Rover 75 engine produces 15 HP more power than Toyota Avensis, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Toyota Avensis. Despite the higher power, Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Avensis is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Rover 75 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Avensis, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 75 could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Rover 75 consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Avensis. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
| 820 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Rover 75 is larger, but lower. Rover 75 is 9 cm longer than the Toyota Avensis, 2 cm wider, while the height of Rover 75 is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1222 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Toyota Avensis. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 75 has
|
Toyota Avensis has
| |