Rover 75 2004 vs Ford Mondeo 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 13 seconds | |
|
Ford Mondeo is a more dynamic driving. Rover 75 engine produces 1 HP more power than Ford Mondeo, but torque is 20 NM less than Ford Mondeo. Despite the higher power, Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 7.6 | |
|
The Rover 75 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 75 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that by driving the Rover 75 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 56 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| Rover 75 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Rover 75 is smaller. Rover 75 is 1 cm shorter than the Ford Mondeo, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 75 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 540 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1222 litres | 1700 litres | |
|
Ford Mondeo has more luggage space. Rover 75 has 140 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mondeo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Mondeo (by 478 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`140 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 75 has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |