Rover 75 2004 vs Citroen C5 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 138 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Citroen C5 is a more dynamic driving. Rover 75 engine produces 22 HP less power than Citroen C5, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Citroen C5. Due to the lower power, Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 7.1 | |
| Rover 75 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C5, which means that by driving the Rover 75 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Rover 75 is larger, but lower. Rover 75 is 3 cm longer than the Citroen C5, 1 cm wider, while the height of Rover 75 is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 563 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1222 litres | no data | |
|
Citroen C5 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Rover 75 has 163 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C5. This could mean that the Rover 75 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Citroen C5 has
| |