Rover 75 1999 vs Audi A6 2001

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Rover 75
1999 - 2004
Audi A6
2001 - 2004
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Rover 75 is available only with front wheel drive, while Audi A6 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 1.8 - 2.51.8 - 4.2

Performance

Power: 116 - 177 HP130 - 300 HP
Torque: 160 - 300 NM195 - 400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.5 - 13.2 seconds6.8 - 11.1 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.8 - 11.15.7 - 13.0
Rover 75 petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Audi A6. On average, Rover 75 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.75 m4.80 m
Width: 1.78 m1.81 m
Height: 1.43 m1.45 m
Both cars are similar in size. Rover 75 is 5 cm shorter than the Audi A6, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 75 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 432 litres551 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
432 litresno data
Audi A6 has more luggage space.
Rover 75 has 119 litres less trunk space than the Audi A6.
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters11.7 meters
The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Audi A6.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`003~ 2`127
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 18001600
Pros and Cons: Rover 75 has
  • lower fuel consumption
Audi A6 has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv