Rover 75 2004 vs Subaru Outback 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Rover 75 is available with front wheel drive, while Subaru Outback can be equipped with four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 - 4.6 (petrol, diesel) | 2.5 - 3.0 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 - 260 HP | 156 - 209 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 - 410 NM | 223 - 282 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 - 14 seconds | 8.9 - 9.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 - 13.4 | 9.5 - 10.5 | |
|
Rover 75 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Subaru Outback. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.58 m | |
|
Rover 75 is larger, but lower. Rover 75 is 7 cm longer than the Subaru Outback, 4 cm wider, while the height of Rover 75 is 19 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 464 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1222 litres | no data | |
|
Subaru Outback has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Rover 75 has 64 litres less trunk space than the Subaru Outback. This could mean that the Rover 75 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`038 | ~ 1`995 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 75 has
|
Subaru Outback has
| |