Renault Megane 2011 vs Peugeot 207 2009
| Body: | Coupe | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 265 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Renault Megane is more dynamic to drive. Renault Megane engine produces 145 HP more power than Peugeot 207, whereas torque is 200 NM more than Peugeot 207. Thanks to more power Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 6.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.1 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 207 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Megane consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 207, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Megane could require 315 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Megane consumes 3.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 207. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 590 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 207 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C5, Citroen C4 Picasso, Peugeot 3008 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.16 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.54 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 377 litres | 337 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1024 litres | 1258 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Renault Megane has 40 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 207. The Peugeot 207 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 207 (by 234 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 1 metres more than that of the Peugeot 207, which means Renault Megane can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`835 | 1`705 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Renault Megane has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 207 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Renault Megane, so Renault Megane quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Peugeot 207 has
| |