Renault Megane 1999 vs Renault Megane 2002
| Body: | Coupe | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 98 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Renault Megane 2002 is a more dynamic driving. Renault Megane 1999 engine produces 22 HP less power than Renault Megane 2002, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Renault Megane 2002. Due to the lower power, Renault Megane 1999 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Renault Megane 1999 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane 2002, which means that by driving the Renault Megane 1999 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Megane 1999 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane 2002. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1360 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| 1050 km with real consumption | 1010 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Volvo V40, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Volvo S40, Mitsubishi Carisma | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Suzuki Grand Vitara | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Megane 1999 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.97 m | 4.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Renault Megane 1999 is smaller. Renault Megane 1999 is 24 cm shorter than the Renault Megane 2002, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Megane 1999 is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 288 litres | 330 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1190 litres | |
|
Renault Megane 2002 has more luggage space. Renault Megane 1999 has 42 litres less trunk space than the Renault Megane 2002. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane 1999 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Renault Megane 2002, which means Renault Megane 1999 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`550 | 1`820 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Renault Megane has
| |