Renault Megane 1999 vs Renault Kangoo 2005
Body: | Estate car / wagon | Minivan / MPV | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 HP | 75 HP | |
Torque: | 114 NM | 105 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.3 seconds | 14.2 seconds | |
Renault Megane and Renault Kangoo have the same engine power, but Renault Megane torque is 9 NM more than Renault Kangoo. Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 7.0 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
The Renault Kangoo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Megane consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kangoo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Megane could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Megane consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kangoo. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
1030 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
750 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.44 m | 4.04 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.67 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.82 m | |
Renault Megane is larger, but lower. Renault Megane is 40 cm longer than the Renault Kangoo, 3 cm wider, while the height of Renault Megane is 40 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 485 litres | 650 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1600 litres | no data | |
Renault Kangoo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Renault Megane has 165 litres less trunk space than the Renault Kangoo. This could mean that the Renault Megane uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 1 metres more than that of the Renault Kangoo, which means Renault Megane can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`660 | 1`150 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | Renault Kangoo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane has serious deffects in 185 percent more cases than Renault Kangoo, so Renault Kangoo quality is probably significantly better | ||
Average price (€): | 800 | 1600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Renault Kangoo has
| |