Renault Megane 2000 vs Chrysler Sebring 2000
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 140 HP | 203 HP | |
Torque: | 200 NM | 278 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 10 seconds | |
Renault Megane engine produces 63 HP less power than Chrysler Sebring, whereas torque is 78 NM less than Chrysler Sebring. Despite less power, Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 10.1 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 10.0 l/100km | |
The Renault Megane is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Megane consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Sebring, which means that by driving the Renault Megane over 15,000 km in a year you can save 375 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Megane consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Sebring. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 62 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
980 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
770 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.97 m | 4.83 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.37 m | 1.37 m | |
Renault Megane is smaller, but slightly higher. Renault Megane is 86 cm shorter than the Chrysler Sebring, 9 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 288 litres | 460 litres | |
Chrysler Sebring has more luggage space. Renault Megane has 172 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler Sebring. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`555 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 800 | 2000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Chrysler Sebring has
| |