Renault Megane 2000 vs Renault Megane 2002
| Body: | Coupe | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Renault Megane 2002 is a more dynamic driving. Renault Megane 2000 engine produces 20 HP less power than Renault Megane 2002, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Renault Megane 2002. Due to the lower power, Renault Megane 2000 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.4 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Volvo V40, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Volvo S40, Mitsubishi Carisma | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Suzuki Grand Vitara | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Megane 2000 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.97 m | 4.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Renault Megane 2000 is smaller. Renault Megane 2000 is 24 cm shorter than the Renault Megane 2002, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Megane 2000 is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 330 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1190 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`820 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Renault Megane has
| |