Renault Megane 2000 vs Renault Megane 2002
| Body: | Coupe | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 107 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 NM | 152 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
| Renault Megane 2000 engine produces 8 HP less power than Renault Megane 2002, whereas torque is 4 NM less than Renault Megane 2002. Despite less power, Renault Megane 2000 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 6.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Megane 2000 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Renault Megane 2000 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane 2002, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Megane 2000 could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Renault Megane 2000 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane 2002. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 25 years | 25 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.97 m | 4.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Renault Megane 2000 is smaller. Renault Megane 2000 is 24 cm shorter than the Renault Megane 2002, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Megane 2000 is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 288 litres | 330 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1190 litres | |
|
Renault Megane 2002 has more luggage space. Renault Megane 2000 has 42 litres less trunk space than the Renault Megane 2002. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`505 | 1`725 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Renault Megane has
| |