Renault Megane 2000 vs Ford Puma 1998

 
Renault Megane
2000 - 2002
Ford Puma
1998 - 2000
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 95 HP90 HP
Torque: 127 NM122 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.4 seconds11.9 seconds
Renault Megane is more dynamic to drive.
Renault Megane engine produces 5 HP more power than Ford Puma, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Ford Puma. Thanks to more power Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.57.2
Real fuel consumption: 7.0 l/100km7.1 l/100km
The Renault Megane is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Renault Megane consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Puma, which means that by driving the Renault Megane over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Megane consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Puma.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres40 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 920 km in combined cycle550 km in combined cycle
1170 km on highway670 km on highway
850 km with real consumption560 km with real consumption
Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.97 m3.98 m
Width: 1.70 m1.67 m
Height: 1.37 m1.34 m
Both cars are similar in size. Renault Megane is 1 cm shorter than the Ford Puma, 3 cm wider, while the height of Renault Megane is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.5 metres more than that of the Ford Puma, which means Renault Megane can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no datano data
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average
no data
Average price (€): 8001000
Pros and Cons: Renault Megane has
  • more power
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv