Renault Megane 2012 vs Renault Laguna 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 256 HP | 205 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
|
Renault Megane is more dynamic to drive. Renault Megane engine produces 51 HP more power than Renault Laguna, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Renault Laguna. Thanks to more power Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 8.0 | |
| Renault Megane consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Megane could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| Renault Laguna gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Renault Megane | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Laguna might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.40 m | |
| Renault Megane is 34 cm shorter than the Renault Laguna, 2 cm wider, while the height of Renault Megane is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 344 litres | 423 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1024 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Laguna has more luggage space. Renault Megane has 79 litres less trunk space than the Renault Laguna. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 1.2 metres more than that of the Renault Laguna, which means Renault Megane can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`887 | 1`923 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Renault Laguna has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Renault Laguna, so Renault Laguna quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Renault Laguna has
| |