Renault Megane 2009 vs Kia Ceed 2009
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 130 HP | 140 HP | |
Torque: | 300 NM | 304 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
Renault Megane engine produces 10 HP less power than Kia Ceed, whereas torque is 4 NM less than Kia Ceed. Despite less power, Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.5 | |
The Renault Megane is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Megane consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed, which means that by driving the Renault Megane over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 53 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
1330 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 4 years | 11 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Suzuki Grand Vitara, Renault Grand Scenic | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Hyundai Santa FE, Kia Sportage, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Ceed might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
The Kia Ceed engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.56 m | 4.49 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.53 m | |
Renault Megane is larger, but lower. Renault Megane is 7 cm longer than the Kia Ceed, 1 cm wider, while the height of Renault Megane is 6 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 524 litres | 534 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1595 litres | no data | |
Despite its longer length, Renault Megane has 10 litres less trunk space than the Kia Ceed. This could mean that the Renault Megane uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.3 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.6 metres more than that of the Kia Ceed, which means Renault Megane can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`862 | 1`970 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | below average | |
Kia Ceed has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Kia Ceed, so Kia Ceed quality is probably slightly better | |||
Average price (€): | 3600 | 3800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |