Renault Megane 2000 vs Ford Escort 1995
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 110 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 17.7 seconds | |
|
Renault Megane is more dynamic to drive. Renault Megane engine produces 40 HP more power than Ford Escort, whereas torque is 90 NM more than Ford Escort. Thanks to more power Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 5.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 5.9 | |
| Renault Megane consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Escort, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Megane could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.16 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.35 m | |
|
Renault Megane is larger. Renault Megane is 2 cm longer than the Ford Escort, 2 cm wider, while the height of Renault Megane is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 348 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1210 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.7 metres more than that of the Ford Escort, which means Renault Megane can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`685 | 900 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Renault Megane has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Escort has serious deffects in 120 percent more cases than Renault Megane, so Renault Megane quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Ford Escort has
| |