Renault Megane 2002 vs Renault Megane 2019
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.7 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Renault Megane 2019 is a more dynamic driving. Renault Megane 2002 engine produces 30 HP less power than Renault Megane 2019, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Renault Megane 2019. Due to the lower power, Renault Megane 2002 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 4.7 | |
|
The Renault Megane 2019 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Megane 2002 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane 2019, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Megane 2002 could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 1360 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| Renault Megane 2002 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Suzuki Grand Vitara | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Megane 2019 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Renault Megane 2019 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Renault Megane 2002 is smaller, but slightly higher. Renault Megane 2002 is 15 cm shorter than the Renault Megane 2019, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Megane 2002 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 335 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1190 litres | 1247 litres | |
| Renault Megane 2002 has 5 litres less trunk space than the Renault Megane 2019. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Megane 2019 (by 57 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane 2002 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Renault Megane 2019, which means Renault Megane 2002 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`820 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 14 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Renault Megane has
| |