Renault Megane 2008 vs Renault Laguna 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Renault Laguna is a more dynamic driving. Renault Megane engine produces 30 HP less power than Renault Laguna, whereas torque is 75 NM less than Renault Laguna. Due to the lower power, Renault Megane reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 8.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.8 l/100km | 9.9 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Megane is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Megane consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna, which means that by driving the Renault Megane over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Megane consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Renault Clio | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Renault Grand Espace | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Laguna might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.44 m | |
| Renault Megane is 40 cm shorter than the Renault Laguna, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Megane is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 372 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1162 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Laguna has more luggage space. Renault Megane has 78 litres less trunk space than the Renault Laguna. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`783 | 2`017 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Renault Laguna has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Renault Megane, so Renault Laguna quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 2400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 8.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Renault Laguna has
| |