Renault Megane 2013 vs Renault Clio 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Renault Megane is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Renault Clio is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 1.2 - 2.0 | 0.9 - 1.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 - 220 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 151 - 380 NM | 135 - 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 - 12.6 seconds | 12.1 - 12.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.5 - 7.3 | 3.2 - 4.5 | |
|
Renault Megane petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Renault Clio. On average, Renault Megane equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Renault Megane is larger. Renault Megane is 30 cm longer than the Renault Clio, 7 cm wider, while the height of Renault Megane is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 524 litres | 443 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1595 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Megane has more luggage capacity. Renault Megane has 81 litres more trunk space than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.5 metres more than that of the Renault Clio, which means Renault Megane can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`866 | ~ 1`676 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Renault Clio has
| |