Renault Megane 2003 vs Chrysler PT Cruiser 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 2.4 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 163 HP | 143 - 223 HP | |
| Torque: | 152 - 300 NM | 214 - 332 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 - 13.6 seconds | 7.6 - 12.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 8.4 | 9.9 - 10.8 | |
|
Renault Megane petrol engines consumes on average 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chrysler PT Cruiser. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.54 m | |
|
Renault Megane is larger, but lower. Renault Megane is 7 cm longer than the Chrysler PT Cruiser, 3 cm wider, while the height of Renault Megane is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 190 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
490 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 1.8 metres less than that of the Chrysler PT Cruiser, which means Renault Megane can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`845 | ~ 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
| |