Renault Megane 2012 vs Kia Cerato 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 256 HP | 126 - 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 151 - 380 NM | 157 - 194 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6 - 12.5 seconds | 9.3 - 11.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.5 - 8.2 | 6.7 - 7.8 | |
|
Renault Megane petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Kia Cerato. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.40 m | |
| Renault Megane is 18 cm shorter than the Kia Cerato, 3 cm wider, while the height of Renault Megane is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 377 litres | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1024 litres | no data | |
|
Kia Cerato has more luggage space. Renault Megane has 63 litres less trunk space than the Kia Cerato. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.35 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 1.15 metres more than that of the Kia Cerato, which means Renault Megane can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`814 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Kia Cerato has
| |