Renault Megane 2003 vs Renault Megane 2003

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Renault Megane
2003 - 2006
Renault Megane
2003 - 2006
Body: SedanEstate car / wagon
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.4 - 2.01.4 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 80 - 136 HP80 - 136 HP
Torque: 127 - 300 NM127 - 300 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.1 - 14.7 seconds9.3 - 14.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.5 - 8.44.6 - 8.4
Renault Megane 2003 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Megane 2003. On average, Renault Megane 2003 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane 2003.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.50 m4.50 m
Width: 1.78 m1.78 m
Height: 1.46 m1.46 m
Both cars are similar in size. Renault Megane 2003 and Renault Megane 2003 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 520 litres520 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1600 litres
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Renault Megane 2003 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Renault Megane 2003.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`801~ 1`847
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

below average
Average price (€): 10001000
Pros and Cons: Renault Megane has
  • lower fuel consumption
Renault Megane has
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv