Renault Megane 2003 vs Renault Megane 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Sedan | Estate car / wagon | |
---|---|---|---|
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 80 - 136 HP | 80 - 136 HP | |
Torque: | 127 - 300 NM | 127 - 300 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 - 14.7 seconds | 9.3 - 14.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 8.4 | 4.6 - 8.4 | |
Renault Megane 2003 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Megane 2003. On average, Renault Megane 2003 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane 2003. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.50 m | 4.50 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Renault Megane 2003 and Renault Megane 2003 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 520 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1600 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Megane 2003 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Renault Megane 2003. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`801 | ~ 1`847 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Renault Megane has
| |