Renault Megane 2003 vs Chevrolet Aveo 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 1.2 - 1.6 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 - 136 HP | 72 - 106 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 - 300 NM | 104 - 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 - 14.7 seconds | 11.1 - 13.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 8.4 | 5.5 - 7.6 | |
|
Renault Megane petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Aveo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Renault Megane is larger, but slightly lower. Renault Megane is 20 cm longer than the Chevrolet Aveo, 8 cm wider, while the height of Renault Megane is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 375 litres | |
|
Renault Megane has more luggage capacity. Renault Megane has 145 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Aveo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.7 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Aveo, which means Renault Megane can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`801 | ~ 1`515 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Megane has
|
Chevrolet Aveo has
| |