Renault Megane 2008 vs Mazda 3 2009

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Renault Megane
2008 - 2012
Mazda 3
2009 - 2011
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.5 - 2.01.6 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 90 - 180 HP105 - 260 HP
Torque: 148 - 300 NM145 - 400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.8 - 12 seconds6.1 - 13.1 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.5 - 7.64.4 - 9.6
Renault Megane petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. On average, Renault Megane equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Ground clearance: 120 mm (4.7 inches)145 - 155 mm (5.7 - 6.1 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 3 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Dimensions

Length: 4.30 m4.47 m
Width: 1.81 m1.76 m
Height: 1.47 m1.47 m
Renault Megane is 17 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 5 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 372 litres481 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1162 litres1360 litres
Mazda 3 has more luggage space.
Renault Megane has 109 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 (by 198 litres).
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Renault Megane is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Renault Megane can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`787~ 1`856
Safety:
Quality:
low

above average
Average price (€): 34004200
Pros and Cons: Renault Megane has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Mazda 3 has
  • higher ground clearance
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv