Renault Laguna 2010 vs Ford Mondeo 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Ford Mondeo is a more dynamic driving. Renault Laguna engine produces 15 HP less power than Ford Mondeo, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Ford Mondeo. Due to the lower power, Renault Laguna reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Laguna is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Laguna consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that by driving the Renault Laguna over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Laguna consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1400 km in combined cycle | 1200 km in combined cycle | |
| 1650 km on highway | 1450 km on highway | ||
| 1130 km with real consumption | 1090 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Laguna gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Renault Laguna is smaller. Renault Laguna is 9 cm shorter than the Ford Mondeo, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Laguna is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 540 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1448 litres | |
|
Ford Mondeo has more luggage space. Renault Laguna has 90 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Laguna is 0.4 metres less than that of the Ford Mondeo, which means Renault Laguna can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`936 | 2`155 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Renault Laguna has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford Mondeo, so Renault Laguna quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Laguna has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |