Renault Laguna 2010 vs Renault Megane 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 - 180 HP | 90 - 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 - 400 NM | 148 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 - 12.2 seconds | 8 - 12.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 8.7 | 4.2 - 7.6 | |
|
Renault Laguna petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Renault Megane. On average, Renault Laguna equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Renault Laguna is larger, but slightly lower. Renault Laguna is 24 cm longer than the Renault Megane, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Laguna is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 508 litres | 524 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1595 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Renault Laguna has 16 litres less trunk space than the Renault Megane. This could mean that the Renault Laguna uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Laguna is 0.1 metres less than that of the Renault Megane. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`021 | ~ 1`842 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Laguna has
|
Renault Megane has
| |