Peugeot 206 2005 vs Mazda 2 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 206 is more dynamic to drive. Peugeot 206 engine produces 20 HP more power than Mazda 2, whereas torque is 35 NM more than Mazda 2. Thanks to more power Peugeot 206 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 5.1 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 206 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 206 could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 206 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 43 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 1020 km in combined cycle | |
| 1210 km on highway | 1160 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.82 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Peugeot 206 is smaller. Peugeot 206 is 8 cm shorter than the Mazda 2, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 206 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 245 litres | 250 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
992 litres | 787 litres | |
| Peugeot 206 has 5 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 2. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 206 (by 205 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 206 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mazda 2. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`521 | 1`540 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 206 has serious deffects in 185 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 206 has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |