Peugeot 206 2004 vs Renault Clio 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 65 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 15 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 206 is more dynamic to drive. Peugeot 206 engine produces 45 HP more power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Renault Clio. Thanks to more power Peugeot 206 reaches 100 km/h speed 5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 4.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 4.6 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 206 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 206 could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 206 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
| 1210 km on highway | 1350 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 1080 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Peugeot 407, Citroen Xsara Picasso | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Nissan Almera, Nissan Micra, Suzuki Jimny | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Peugeot 206 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.82 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Peugeot 206 is 1 cm longer than the Renault Clio, 1 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 206 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 210 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
992 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Peugeot 206 has 300 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. This could mean that the Peugeot 206 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 206 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Peugeot 206 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`521 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Peugeot 206 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Peugeot 206, so Peugeot 206 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 206 has
|
Renault Clio has
| |