Peugeot 206 2009 vs Suzuki Swift 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 94 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 NM | 118 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Swift is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 206 engine produces 19 HP less power than Suzuki Swift, but torque is 2 NM more than Suzuki Swift. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 206 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 5.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Swift is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 206 consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 206 could require 195 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 206 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Citroen C3, Peugeot 207, Citroen C2, Peugeot Bipper | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Baleno, Suzuki Ignis | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.87 m | 3.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.51 m | |
| Peugeot 206 is 2 cm longer than the Suzuki Swift, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 206 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 245 litres | 204 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
992 litres | no data | |
|
Peugeot 206 has more luggage capacity. Peugeot 206 has 41 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 206 is 1.2 metres more than that of the Suzuki Swift, which means Peugeot 206 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`421 | 1`480 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Suzuki Swift has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 206 has serious deffects in 215 percent more cases than Suzuki Swift, so Suzuki Swift quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 206 has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |