Opel Omega 1989 vs Audi 80 1993

 
Opel Omega
1989 - 1992
Audi 80
1993 - 1995
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.3 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 101 HP90 HP
Torque: 215 NM202 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 15.5 seconds14.7 seconds
Opel Omega engine produces 11 HP more power than Audi 80, whereas torque is 13 NM more than Audi 80. Despite the higher power, Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.26.2
The Audi 80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Opel Omega consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi 80, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Omega could require 150 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres66 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1040 km in combined cycle1060 km in combined cycle

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.74 m4.48 m
Width: 1.76 m1.70 m
Height: 1.44 m1.41 m
Opel Omega is larger.
Opel Omega is 26 cm longer than the Audi 80, 6 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 520 litres430 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
870 litres710 litres
Opel Omega has more luggage capacity.
Opel Omega has 90 litres more trunk space than the Audi 80. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Omega (by 160 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters11.2 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.3 metres less than that of the Audi 80.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8951`750
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
low

average
Audi 80 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Opel Omega has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Audi 80, so Audi 80 quality is probably better
Average price (€): 3000800
Pros and Cons: Opel Omega has
  • more power
  • roomier boot
Audi 80 has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv