Opel Omega 1994 vs Subaru Outback 2017
| Body: | Sedan | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Subaru Outback is a more dynamic driving. Opel Omega engine produces 45 HP less power than Subaru Outback, but torque is 15 NM more than Subaru Outback. Due to the lower power, Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.1 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
|
The Subaru Outback is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Opel Omega consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback, which means that by driving the Opel Omega over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Opel Omega consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 820 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Opel Omega is smaller. Opel Omega is 3 cm shorter than the Subaru Outback, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Omega is 22 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 512 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
830 litres | no data | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Opel Omega has 18 litres more trunk space than the Subaru Outback. The Subaru Outback may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 2`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 26 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Omega has
|
Subaru Outback has
| |