Opel Omega 1994 vs SAAB 9000 1994
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 136 HP | 170 HP | |
Torque: | 185 NM | 260 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
SAAB 9000 is a more dynamic driving. Opel Omega engine produces 34 HP less power than SAAB 9000, whereas torque is 75 NM less than SAAB 9000. Due to the lower power, Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 9.6 | |
The Opel Omega is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Omega consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9000, which means that by driving the Opel Omega over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 66 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
1110 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Front-wheel drive cars (SAAB 9000) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Opel Omega) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 440'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Omega engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 6 years | 4 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Opel Astra, Opel Vectra, Opel Calibra | Used only for this car | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Opel Omega might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.79 m | 4.79 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.42 m | |
Opel Omega and SAAB 9000 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
830 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.1 metres more than that of the SAAB 9000. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`010 | 1`600 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Opel Omega has
|
SAAB 9000 has
| |