Opel Omega 1994 vs Ford Scorpio 1997

 
Opel Omega
1994 - 1997
Ford Scorpio
1997 - 1998
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 136 HP115 HP
Torque: 185 NM167 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11 seconds12.8 seconds
Opel Omega is more dynamic to drive.
Opel Omega engine produces 21 HP more power than Ford Scorpio, whereas torque is 18 NM more than Ford Scorpio. Thanks to more power Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.59.9
The Opel Omega is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Opel Omega consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Scorpio, which means that by driving the Opel Omega over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 880 km in combined cycle700 km in combined cycle
1110 km on highway880 km on highway
Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.79 m4.82 m
Width: 1.79 m1.88 m
Height: 1.46 m1.39 m
Opel Omega is smaller, but higher.
Opel Omega is 3 cm shorter than the Ford Scorpio, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Omega is 7 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 530 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
830 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.6 metres more than that of the Ford Scorpio, which means Opel Omega can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0101`620
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
low

below average
Ford Scorpio has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Opel Omega, so Ford Scorpio quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 800no data
Pros and Cons: Opel Omega has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Ford Scorpio has
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv