Opel Omega 1994 vs Audi A6 1997

 
Opel Omega
1994 - 1997
Audi A6
1997 - 2001
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.4 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain and belt

Performance

Power: 136 HP165 HP
Torque: 185 NM230 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11 seconds9.4 seconds
Audi A6 is a more dynamic driving.
Opel Omega engine produces 29 HP less power than Audi A6, whereas torque is 45 NM less than Audi A6. Due to the lower power, Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.59.9
Real fuel consumption: 9.4 l/100km10.1 l/100km
The Opel Omega is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Opel Omega consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6, which means that by driving the Opel Omega over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Omega consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 880 km in combined cycle700 km in combined cycle
1110 km on highway930 km on highway
790 km with real consumption690 km with real consumption
Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 480'000 km460'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 6 years3 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Opel Astra, Opel Vectra, Opel CalibraUsed also on Audi A4
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Opel Omega might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.79 m4.80 m
Width: 1.79 m1.81 m
Height: 1.46 m1.45 m
Both cars are similar in size. Opel Omega is 1 cm shorter than the Audi A6, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Omega is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 530 litres551 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
830 litresno data
Audi A6 has more luggage space.
Opel Omega has 21 litres less trunk space than the Audi A6.
Turning diameter: 11 meters11.7 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.7 metres less than that of the Audi A6, which means Opel Omega can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0102`030
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

below average
Audi A6 has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Opel Omega, so Audi A6 quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 8001400
Pros and Cons: Opel Omega has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Audi A6 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv