Opel Omega 1994 vs Volvo 940 1996

 
Opel Omega
1994 - 1997
Volvo 940
1996 - 1997
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.3 Petrol

Performance

Power: 136 HP165 HP
Torque: 185 NM264 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11 seconds9.1 seconds
Volvo 940 is a more dynamic driving.
Opel Omega engine produces 29 HP less power than Volvo 940, whereas torque is 79 NM less than Volvo 940. Due to the lower power, Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.59.9
Real fuel consumption: 9.4 l/100km10.6 l/100km
The Opel Omega is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Opel Omega consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 940, which means that by driving the Opel Omega over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Omega consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 940.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres75 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 880 km in combined cycle750 km in combined cycle
790 km with real consumption700 km with real consumption
Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.79 m4.87 m
Width: 1.79 m1.75 m
Height: 1.46 m1.41 m
Opel Omega is 8 cm shorter than the Volvo 940, 4 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 5 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 530 litres471 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
830 litresno data
Opel Omega has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Opel Omega has 59 litres more trunk space than the Volvo 940. The Volvo 940 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 11 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 2`0101`905
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

high
Volvo 940 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Opel Omega has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Volvo 940, so Volvo 940 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 8001600
Pros and Cons: Opel Omega has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Volvo 940 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv