Opel Omega 1999 vs BMW 5 series 1995

 
Opel Omega
1999 - 2001
BMW 5 series
1995 - 2000
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 3.0 Petrol2.8 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 211 HP193 HP
Torque: 270 NM280 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.5 seconds7.5 seconds
BMW 5 series is a more dynamic driving.
Opel Omega engine produces 18 HP more power than BMW 5 series, but torque is 10 NM less than BMW 5 series. Despite the higher power, Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.49.9
Real fuel consumption: 10.6 l/100km9.9 l/100km
The BMW 5 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Opel Omega consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Omega could require 75 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Omega consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 720 km in combined cycle700 km in combined cycle
940 km on highway940 km on highway
700 km with real consumption700 km with real consumption

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 530'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Omega engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 7 years7 years
Engine spread: Used also on Opel SintraInstalled on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 3 sērija, BMW 7 sērija, BMW Z3
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW 5 series might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.90 m4.78 m
Width: 1.78 m1.80 m
Height: 1.46 m1.44 m
Opel Omega is 12 cm longer than the BMW 5 series, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Omega is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 530 litres460 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
830 litresno data
Opel Omega has more luggage capacity.
Opel Omega has 70 litres more trunk space than the BMW 5 series.
Turning diameter: 11 meters11 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`1702`040
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

below average
BMW 5 series has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Opel Omega, so BMW 5 series quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 12002200
Pros and Cons: Opel Omega has
  • timing belt engine
  • more power
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
BMW 5 sērija has
  • timing chain engine
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv