Opel Omega 2000 vs Opel Omega 1994

 
Opel Omega
2000 - 2003
Opel Omega
1994 - 1997
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.2 Diesel2.5 Diesel

Performance

Power: 120 HP130 HP
Torque: 280 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.5 seconds12 seconds
Opel Omega 1994 is a more dynamic driving.
Opel Omega 2000 engine produces 10 HP less power than Opel Omega 1994, but torque is 30 NM more than Opel Omega 1994. Due to the lower power, Opel Omega 2000 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.17.4
Real fuel consumption: 7.1 l/100km8.3 l/100km
The Opel Omega 2000 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Opel Omega 2000 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega 1994, which means that by driving the Opel Omega 2000 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Omega 2000 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega 1994.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres75 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1050 km in combined cycle1010 km in combined cycle
1330 km on highway1220 km on highway
1050 km with real consumption900 km with real consumption
Ground clearance: 150 mm (5.9 inches)140 mm (5.5 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Opel Omega 2000 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Opel Omega 2000 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions.

Dimensions

Length: 4.90 m4.79 m
Width: 1.78 m1.79 m
Height: 1.46 m1.46 m
Opel Omega 2000 is 11 cm longer than the Opel Omega 1994, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 530 litres530 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
830 litres830 litres
Turning diameter: 11 meters11 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`1452`170
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

below average
Opel Omega 2000 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Opel Omega 1994 has serious deffects in 1395 percent more cases than Opel Omega 2000, so Opel Omega 2000 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 1200800
Pros and Cons: Opel Omega has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher ground clearance
  • fewer faults
Opel Omega has
  • more power
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv