Opel Omega 1999 vs BMW 3 series 2001

 
Opel Omega
1999 - 2000
BMW 3 series
2001 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 100 HP115 HP
Torque: 205 NM265 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 15 seconds11 seconds
BMW 3 series is a more dynamic driving.
Opel Omega engine produces 15 HP less power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 60 NM less than BMW 3 series. Due to the lower power, Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.65.6
Real fuel consumption: 8.0 l/100km6.1 l/100km
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Opel Omega consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Omega could require 150 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Omega consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres63 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1130 km in combined cycle1120 km in combined cycle
1470 km on highway1400 km on highway
930 km with real consumption1030 km with real consumption

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 460'000 km480'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 3 years9 years
Engine spread: Used also on Opel VectraUsed also on BMW 5 sērija
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW 3 series might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.90 m4.47 m
Width: 1.78 m1.74 m
Height: 1.46 m1.42 m
Opel Omega is larger.
Opel Omega is 43 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, 4 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 530 litres440 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
830 litresno data
Opel Omega has more luggage capacity.
Opel Omega has 90 litres more trunk space than the BMW 3 series.
Turning diameter: 11 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 1 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Opel Omega can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0901`895
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

high
BMW 3 series has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Opel Omega has serious deffects in 530 percent more cases than BMW 3 series, so BMW 3 series quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 12002200
Pros and Cons: Opel Omega has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
BMW 3 sērija has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv