Opel Omega 1997 vs BMW 5 series 2000
Body: | Estate car / wagon | Sedan | |
---|---|---|---|
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 131 HP | 163 HP | |
Torque: | 250 NM | 350 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
BMW 5 series is a more dynamic driving. Opel Omega engine produces 32 HP less power than BMW 5 series, whereas torque is 100 NM less than BMW 5 series. Due to the lower power, Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 6.7 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
The BMW 5 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Omega consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Omega could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Omega consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
1170 km on highway | 1320 km on highway | ||
890 km with real consumption | 970 km with real consumption | ||
BMW 5 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.82 m | 4.78 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.50 m | 1.44 m | |
Opel Omega is 4 cm longer than the BMW 5 series, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Omega is 6 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 460 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1800 litres | no data | |
Opel Omega has more luggage capacity. Opel Omega has 80 litres more trunk space than the BMW 5 series. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`280 | 2`115 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | below average | below average | |
BMW 5 series has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Opel Omega, so BMW 5 series quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 1000 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Opel Omega has
|
BMW 5 sērija has
| |